South Carolina, in a move that is becoming increasingly common among various state legislatures (or their medical boards), is on the verge of completely re-writing its telemedicine law – including the often murky issue of when it is appropriate for physicians to prescribe medications (especially non-narcotic) via telemedicine visits in the absence of a prior in-person physical exam being performed by the prescribing physician.
On May 25, 2016, the South Carolina legislature sent to Governor Nikki Haley Senate Bill 1035, which facilitates the use of telemedicine by establishing certain recordkeeping requirements. SB 1035 also defines “telemedicine” and details the requirement of a physician-patient relationship, so as to allow the prescribing of medication when the physician-patient relationship is established solely via telemedicine.
More specifically, the bill provides the following details:
1. adhere to current standards for practice improvement and monitoring of outcomes and provide reports containing such information upon request of the board;
2. provide an appropriate evaluation prior to diagnosing and/or treating the patient utilizing technology sufficient to accurately diagnose and treat the patient or, in the alternative, use of a licensed healthcare professional as a telemedicine presenter is permitted in order to provide various physical findings the physician may need to complete an adequate assessment;
3. verify the identity and location of the patient and be prepared to inform the patient of the physician’s name, location, and professional credentials;
4. establish a diagnosis through the use of accepted medical practices, which may include patient history, mental status evaluation, physical examination, and appropriate diagnostic and laboratory testing in conformity with the applicable standard of care;
5. ensure the availability of appropriate follow-up care;
6. Schedule II and Schedule III prescriptions are not permitted unless specifically authorized by the board;
7. maintain a complete record of the patient’s care according to prevailing medical record standards that reflects an appropriate evaluation of the patient’s presenting symptoms;
8. maintain the confidentiality of the patient’s records;
9. have a valid, current South Carolina medical license; and
10. discuss with the patient the value of having a primary care medical home and provide assistance in identifying available options for a primary care medical home.
SB 1035 is set to take effect upon approval by the Governor (which, at the time of this entry, has not yet occurred).
How does the recent activity in South Carolina, and several other states, impact the bigger picture of telemedicine? For starters, as more states adopt standards for conducting telemedicine, a loose uniformity emerges amongst the states as to what the appropriate standard of care is when conducting telemedicine visits. The more familiar themes are: (1) stating exactly what is not permitted; (2) a telemedicine encounter must approximate an in-person visit (i.e. sufficient information must be secured in order to render a diagnosis and/or prescribe a medication for the patient); (3) the type of communication system that is required to be used; and (4) failure to adhere to the standard of care will be subject to discipline (which initially may result in a physician being subjected to more harsh penalties). Second, it appears that for most states (but not all) a reasonable recognition is taking hold that telemedicine is not a different form of medical care, but rather a different method of delivery of the same medical care (with the same standard of care) that would have, in the absence of modern technology, been provided in-person.
Which state is next and what approach will they take? Stay tuned!
More White Collar blogs can be found here.
Pietragallo Partner Kevin Raphael will be speaking at the University Risk Management and Insurance Association’s (URMIA) Northeast Regional Conference on April 15th and 16th in Philadelphia, PA. Mr. Raphael will be one of three panelists, along with Benjamin Evans (Associate Vice President for Risk Management and Insurance at University of Pennsylvania) and Dean Constatine (Global… Read more »Read More
On Thursday, February 20, Pietragallo Partner Jim Marrion will sit on a panel about the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law. During this three-hour CLE, offered through the Allegheny County Bar Association, panelists will discuss, in-depth, the issues under the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law that attorneys need to be aware… Read more »Read More
Nationally-recognized qui tam attorney, Marc S. Raspanti, will be speaking at the Federal Bar Association’s 2020 Qui Tam Conference in Washington, DC on Thursday, February 27, 2020. This two-day conference will feature experienced FCA litigators from a variety of perspectives who will dive into advanced topics and discuss emerging trends and key developments pertaining to… Read more »Read More
Pietragallo Gordon Alfano Bosick & Raspanti, LLP Partner Michael A. Morse will be presenting at the Pennsylvania Bar Institute’s (“PBI”) Health Law Institute on March 11-12, 2020. Mr. Morse’s session topic is, “Preparing for the Fight of Your Life: Anatomy of a Health Care Fraud Prosecution.” The PBI notes that the Health Law Institute is,… Read more »Read More