South Carolina Legislature Sends Overhaul Of Its Telemedicine Laws To Governor Haley For Her Approval

June 3, 2016

South Carolina, in a move that is becoming increasingly common among various state legislatures (or their medical boards), is on the verge of completely re-writing its telemedicine law – including the often murky issue of when it is appropriate for physicians to prescribe medications (especially non-narcotic) via telemedicine visits in the absence of a prior in-person physical exam being performed by the prescribing physician.

On May 25, 2016, the South Carolina legislature sent to Governor Nikki Haley Senate Bill 1035, which facilitates the use of telemedicine by establishing certain recordkeeping requirements.  SB 1035 also defines “telemedicine” and details the requirement of a physician-patient relationship, so as to allow the prescribing of medication when the physician-patient relationship is established solely via telemedicine.

More specifically, the bill provides the following details:

  • ‘Telemedicine’ means the practice of medicine using electronic communications, information technology, or other means between a “licensee” in one location and a patient in another location with or without an intervening practitioner.
  • A physician may prescribe for a patient whom the physician has not personally examined, when the physician has established a physician-patient relationship solely via telemedicine, and so long as the physician complies with Section 40-47-37 of the act.
  • A physician who establishes a physician-patient relationship solely via telemedicine shall adhere to the same standard of care as a physician employing more traditional in-person medical care and shall be evaluated according to the standard of care applicable to the physician’s area of specialty.
  • A physician shall not establish a physician-patient relationship via telemedicine for the purpose of prescribing medication when an in-person physical examination is necessary for diagnosis.
  • A physician who establishes a physician-patient relationship solely via telemedicine shall generate and maintain medical records for each patient in compliance with any applicable state and federal laws, rules, and regulations.  Records shall be accessible to other practitioners and to the patient in a timely fashion when lawfully requested.
  • Prescribing of lifestyle medications is expressly prohibited (i.e. erectile dysfunction drugs or abortion inducing drugs) unless permitted by the medical board.
  • A simple questionnaire without an appropriate evaluation is prohibited.
  • A physician, practitioner, or any other person involved in a telemedicine encounter must be trained in the use of the telemedicine equipment and competent in its operation.
  • Moreover, a physician who establishes a physician-patient relationship solely via telemedicine has numerous additional requirements:

1. adhere to current standards for practice improvement and monitoring of outcomes and provide reports containing such information upon request of the board;

2. provide an appropriate evaluation prior to diagnosing and/or treating the patient utilizing technology sufficient to accurately diagnose and treat the patient or, in the alternative, use of a licensed healthcare professional as a telemedicine presenter is permitted in order to provide various physical findings the physician may need to complete an adequate assessment;

3. verify the identity and location of the patient and be prepared to inform the patient of the physician’s name, location, and professional credentials;

4. establish a diagnosis through the use of accepted medical practices, which may include patient history, mental status evaluation, physical examination, and appropriate diagnostic and laboratory testing in conformity with the applicable standard of care;

5. ensure the availability of appropriate follow-up care;

6. Schedule II and Schedule III prescriptions are not permitted unless specifically authorized by the board;

7. maintain a complete record of the patient’s care according to prevailing medical record standards that reflects an appropriate evaluation of the patient’s presenting symptoms;

8. maintain the confidentiality of the patient’s records;

9. have a valid, current South Carolina medical license;  and

10. discuss with the patient the value of having a primary care medical home and provide assistance in identifying available options for a primary care medical home.

SB 1035 is set to take effect upon approval by the Governor (which, at the time of this entry, has not yet occurred).

How does the recent activity in South Carolina, and several other states, impact the bigger picture of telemedicine?  For starters, as more states adopt standards for conducting telemedicine, a loose uniformity emerges amongst the states as to what the appropriate standard of care is when conducting telemedicine visits.  The more familiar themes are: (1) stating exactly what is not permitted; (2) a telemedicine encounter must approximate an in-person visit (i.e. sufficient information must be secured in order to render a diagnosis and/or prescribe a medication for the patient); (3) the type of communication system that is required to be used; and (4) failure to adhere to the standard of care will be subject to discipline (which initially may result in a physician being subjected to more harsh penalties).  Second, it appears that for most states (but not all) a reasonable recognition is taking hold that telemedicine is not a different form of medical care, but rather a different method of delivery of the same medical care (with the same standard of care) that would have, in the absence of modern technology, been provided in-person.

Which state is next and what approach will they take?  Stay tuned!

More White Collar blogs can be found here.

News & Events

Related News

27 Pietragallo Lawyers Named in 2025 The Best Lawyers In America and Ones to Watch
August 15, 2024
Pietragallo Gordon Alfano Bosick & Raspanti, LLP is pleased to announce that 27 lawyers have been named as 2025 The Best Lawyers in America® and Ones to Watch. Read More
Douglas K. Rosenblum Appointed as a Hearing Committee Member Serving the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
July 1, 2024
Partner Douglas K. Rosenblum of Pietragallo Gordon Alfano Bosick & Raspanti, LLP has been appointed as a Hearing Committee Member serving the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania effective July 1, 2024. Read More
View More News & Events