Religious Colleges Subject to the Jurisdiction of the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission

On April 7, 2017, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania issued its opinion in Chestnut Hill College v. Pennsylvania Human Rel. Commn., 844 C.D. 2016, — A –, 2017 WL 1289250, (Pa. Commw. Apr. 7, 2017), holding, in a case of first impression, that a Catholic college’s decision to expel a student could be challenged under the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (“PHRA”).

During administrative proceedings before the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission (“PHRC”), Chestnut Hill College (“the college”) claimed that the PHRC lacked jurisdiction over the matter because, the college asserted, it was not a “public accommodation” under the PHRA and, moreover, that any exercise of jurisdiction would violate the college’s First Amendment rights.  The PHRC rejected those arguments and the appeal followed.

The Commonwealth Court affirmed.  The Court noted that the scope of “public accommodations” under the PHRA is broad.  Accordingly, “[p]rovided the College accepts . . . the patronage of the general public, and is not in its nature distinctly private, it constitutes a public accommodation as defined by the Act.”  The Court rejected the college’s position that it was “distinctively private” given its religious affiliation.   The Court noted that unlike a parochial school, which is heavily focused on indoctrinating students in the relevant religious faith, religious colleges remain largely secular in their educational functions.  The Court also rejected the college’s position that the First Amendment precluded jurisdiction.  While the Court recognized that, under the First Amendment, “generally courts must defer to church hierarchy in the resolution of any ecclesiastical matter,” the Court concluded that the expulsion decision could be reviewed under “neutral principles of law” and thus the judiciary would not be tasked with delving into religious doctrine.

Chestnut Hill broadens the scope of the PHRA and PHRC.  Prior to Chestnut Hill, many religious colleges and universities could rely on established precedent holding that parochial grade schools are not “public accommodations” to argue that their institutions are outside the scope of the PHRA and PHRC.  Such precedent is now largely limited to parochial grade schools.

News & Events

Related News

September 19, 2019

On November 19-20, 2019, the Pennsylvania Bar Institute will host it’s Employment Law Institute West in Pittsburgh, PA. Pietragallo Partner, and Employment & Labor Group Leader, Shelly R Pagac, will be serving as faculty. The Institute is a two-day, premier employment law event in Western Pennsylvania and is organized every year by the Pennsylvania Bar Institute,… Read more »

Read More
September 19, 2019

Pietragallo Gordon Alfano Bosick & Raspanti, LLP is pleased to announce that Pamela Coyle Brecht, the Chair of the Firm’s Qui Tam Practice Group, has been selected by the Philadelphia Business Journal as a Recipient of the 2019 Best of the Bar Awards. The awards identify Philadelphia’s top lawyers across nine categories, including White-collar defense… Read more »

Read More

Upcoming Events

October 25, 2019

Joe Gordon will be presenting at the Greater Valley Forge HR Summit in Malvern, PA on October 25, 2019. Joe’s presentation is titled, “Employee Benefits of the Future – How Legal Developments Will Drive Profound Change.” In his presentation, Mr. Gordon will explore cultural pressures and the evolution of discrimination laws that will have a… Read more »

Read More
October 30, 2019

Pamela Coyle Brecht has been invited to speak on a panel at the Pennsylvania Bar Institute’s “A Day on Health Law” event which is scheduled to take place on Wednesday, October 30, 2019, in Philadelphia. Ms. Brecht will be a part of the program titled “False Claims Act Update.” The number of False Claims Act… Read more »

Read More
View More News & Events