Implementing Workplace Anti-Bullying & Gossip Policies

February 25, 2014

As the topics of workplace bullying, gossip, and harassment have garnered attention, employers must be precise in enacting protective policies. In Laurus Technical Institute and Joslyn Henderson, a National Labor Relations Board Judge rejected a “No Gossip Policy” that prohibited discussing a person’s personal life when they were not present, discussing a person’s professional life without their supervisor present, negative or untrue comments about a person, injuring a person’s reputation, or sharing a rumor about the person.

The ALJ held that the policy would reasonably tend to chill employees in the exercise of their protected rights. Specifically, the ALJ noted that the policy was vague and overly broad, as it precluded both negative and positive comments about managers and the company. The ALJ compared the “No Gossip Policy” to prior Board decisions that invalidated employer policies banning “false and profane statements,” “disrespectful conduct,” “negative conversations,” and “disparaging comments.”

Despite this decision, a carefully drafted anti-gossip or anti-bullying policy can withstand scrutiny. Applying principles previously upheld by the Board, an employer should include the following when drafting a policy:

  1. A preamble to the policy that states its purpose, i.e. eliminating bullying in the workplace.
  2. Clear definitions of any term that may be subject to multiple meanings.
  3. Examples of the activities the policy is designed to prevent. For instance, an anti-bullying policy should include language prohibiting inflammatory comments about an individual’s height, weight, voice, or intelligence level.
  4. Examples of the workplace harm bullying may cause, i.e. lower morale, absenteeism, and creating an unsafe working environment.
  5. A procedure for victims of bullying to seek assistance, including management contacts.

These suggestions are merely a few that should be implemented in an anti-bullying or anti-gossip policy. A company planning to enact or renew a policy should have a thorough understanding of the problems facing its workplace in order to draft a precise policy addressing its specific needs.

News & Events

Related News

Pietragallo Adds Cybersecurity Lawyer Martin T. Shepherd
October 7, 2021
Martin T. Shepherd, a well-known and respected litigation lawyer, has joined Pietragallo Gordon Alfano Bosick & Raspanti, LLP in the firm’s Commercial Litigation team and as head of the firm’s Diversity Initiative. Read More
Pietragallo Partner James W. Kraus Admitted to the American College of Trial Lawyers
October 4, 2021
Pietragallo is pleased to announce that partner James W. Kraus has become a Fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers (the College), one of the premier legal associations in North America.  Read More

Upcoming Events

Bitcoin, Cryptocurrency, and Civil Litigation CLE (Webinar)
November 3, 2021
As Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies gain further acceptance in the portfolios held by persons, corporations, trusts, and estates, fiduciaries and civil litigants must be aware of how courts will handle claims when the ownership or stewardship of these assets becomes disputed.
Read More
Privacy, Data and Cyber Security: The Current Legal Landscape CLE (Webinar)
November 11, 2021
Companies and consumers alike are under perpetual assault from bad actors as IoT, work from home, and cloud migration – all intended to improve productivity – have expanded the cyber attack surface.
Read More
View More News & Events