Employee Assistance Program Triggers Litigation

November 2, 2010

Employee Assistance Programs (“EAPs”) are common among employers.  These programs are designed to assist employees with personal issues arising within or outside the office, that may affect their work performance and productivity.  The use of EAP, however, can impact litigation.

Recently, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania highlighted the significance of EAPs as they relate to claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”).  In Hobson v. St. Luke’s Hospital, the plaintiff, a paramedic, sued his former employer for, among other things, discrimination under the ADA.  The plaintiff had repeatedly made advances toward a co-worker, who then complained to her supervisor.  During the course of the investigation, the supervisor commented to the plaintiff that he was “obsessed” with the co-worker and had a mental disability.  The supervisor then recommended that the plaintiff seek counseling through the company’s EAP.  Ultimately, the plaintiff was terminated.

The plaintiff sued and alleged, among other things, that he had been discriminated against based on a perceived disability in violation of the ADA.  His perceived disability claim was based in large part on the supervisor’s recommendation that he seek counseling through the EAP.  The plaintiff argued that the fact of the recommendation showed that he was “regarded as” being disabled by his employer.  The Court, however, disagreed.

An employee is “disabled” and, thus, covered by the ADA’s protection if he is “regarded as” having a physical impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities – – here, the major life activity was working.  The Court found that the supervisor had merely expressed concern about the plaintiff’s mental health when it was suggested that the plaintiff seek counseling through the EAP.  The Court found support for its conclusion in recent case law holding that an employee is not “regarded as” being disabled simply because the employer requires a pre-return health evaluation prior to the employee returning to work after being out for medical leave.

This decision is significant due to the prevalence of EAPs in many employers.  Indeed, employers frequently recommend that employees seek assistance for their personal issues through an EAP in an effort to handle workplace issues.

This decision provides some measure of comfort to employers who utilize EAP referrals to deal with problem employees.  However, it also provides a cautionary note:  make referrals, but supervisors or any employer representatives, should not share their opinions or thoughts regarding the employee’s state of mind or condition – it might just be Exhibit “A” in a disability discrimination claim.

News & Events

Related News

Pietragallo Expands Litigation Practice with New Hires
April 12, 2021
In a significant expansion of the firm’s litigation practice, Pietragallo Gordon Alfano Bosick & Raspanti, LLP is pleased to announce the addition of four new associates to the firm’s Pittsburgh and Philadelphia Offices. Read More
From our COVID-19 Response Team: Pennsylvania Business Guidance For Probable or Confirmed Case of COVID-19
August 26, 2020
As COVID-19 continues to spread globally and throughout Pennsylvania, most employers will be faced with the question of how to respond when an employee tests positive, or has exposure to the coronavirus, and will need to determine when those employees can safely return to work.  Read More

Upcoming Events

COVID-19 Back-To-Work Guidance [WEBINAR]
May 6, 2021

What to Know about Returning to an In-Person Environment

Please join us as we provide guidance to employers ensuring their employees, and customers, feel safe in returning to an in-person environment. Read More
View More News & Events