U.S. Supreme Court – Same Sex Marriage – Family Medical Leave

September 17, 2013

In light of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Windsor, which struck down certain provisions of the Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”), the U.S. Department of Labor (“DOL”) recently revised its regulations pertaining to the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”).  Prior to the Windsor decision, in determining FMLA benefits, the DOL relied on Section 3 of DOMA, which limited marriage only to a legal union between one man and one woman and the word “spouse,” which referred only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or wife.  Thus, same-sex couples were not entitled to FMLA leave even if they lived in a state that recognized same-sex marriage.

In Windsor, the Court held that Section 3 of DOMA was unconstitutional because the regulation of marriage traditionally rests exclusively with the states.  On August 9, 2013, the DOL issued an internal memorandum to DOL staff members advising them that the DOL has revised its guidance documents to remove any reference to DOMA and to clarify that an employee in a same-sex marriage who resides in a state that allows same-sex marriage is entitled to take FMLA leave to care for the employee’s same-sex spouse with a serious health condition.

Notably, the law of the state where the employee resides applies, not the law of the state where the employee works.  As of August 9, 2013, the following thirteen states (and the District of Columbia) recognize same-sex marriage:  California, Connecticut, Delaware, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington.

Conclusion

For many employers, particularly those with employees who live in one or more states, the decision regarding FMLA leave becomes significantly more complicated.  For instance, an employee who resides in Delaware, which recognizes same-sex marriage, will be entitled to FMLA leave to care for a same-sex spouse (with a serious health condition) while an employee who resides in Pennsylvania, which does not recognize same-sex marriage, will not be afforded a similar opportunity.  Employers should carefully review their FMLA policies and procedures to ensure that they comply with the DOL’s recent revisions.

News & Events

Related News

2026 Chambers High Net Worth Guide Recognizes Pietragallo as a Leading Law Firm in Pennsylvania
July 23, 2026
Pietragallo Gordon Alfano Bosick & Raspanti, LLP has once again been recognized by the premier independent legal research organization, Chambers and Partners USA, in its 2026 High Net Worth Guide, earning Band 2 rankings in both Family/Matrimonial and Private Wealth Disputes in Pennsylvania. In addition to the firm’s practice rankings, three Pietragallo partners received individual Band... Read more »
Carla Schiff Donnelly Co-Hosts Law in the Family Podcast
July 22, 2026
Partner Carla Schiff Donnelly co-hosted an episode of the podcast Law in the Family, “A Discussion with New PBA Family Law Section Chair Candice Komar” that was released July 2, 2026. Carla sat down with Candice to discuss her goals for the upcoming year as the newly elected Chair of the Pennsylvania Bar Association Family... Read more »
View More News & Events